A PMO spends too much of its week collecting status and too little using it. Husn reads the work directly, so the dashboard is current without anyone filling in a form.
Husn reads your tools - never changes them
The PMO is the team that chases everyone else for updates, then spends what time remains formatting them. The dashboard is only ever as fresh as the last submission cycle, and the work has moved on by the time it is presented.
Every project added means another owner to chase and another format to reconcile, so the PMO's effort scales with the portfolio.
Hand collected status is always a cycle behind, and the gap between report and reality widens as the portfolio grows.
The PMO ends up as a reporting function when it should be a steering one, because collection eats the time analysis needs.
Husn reads and reasons, and never changes your tools.
Replace the weekly collection scramble with a dashboard that is already up to date from the work.
Hold projects to account using what the work shows, not just what each owner chose to submit.
Spend the hours you used to spend chasing status on the analysis the organization actually needs.
They do not have to for the dashboard to be current. Husn reads the work directly. Where teams do submit status, Husn shows where it diverges from reality.
Yes. Husn reconciles individual projects and whole programs into one view, on consistent terms.
No. The PMO view is built entirely from reading. Husn never writes back.
It updates continuously from the underlying work, so it does not wait on a submission cycle.
Connect your portfolio and Husn will build a current PMO view from the work, with no status requests, in about fifteen minutes.